<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Politics on A journey into a wild pointer</title>
    <link>https://carette.xyz/tags/politics/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Politics on A journey into a wild pointer</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 12:07:01 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://carette.xyz/tags/politics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Lobbying is corruption</title>
      <link>https://carette.xyz/posts/lobbying_and_corruption/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 12:07:01 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://carette.xyz/posts/lobbying_and_corruption/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Have you ever tried to explain lobbying to a European?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neither have I. But &lt;a href=&#34;https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/10/10/lobbying.html&#34;&gt;George Hotz just did the opposite&lt;/a&gt;: he explained it to everyone who is not American.&lt;br&gt;
Read it. It is short, funny, and devastating.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;His version goes like this.&lt;br&gt;
Corporations and rich people give money to politicians. Not directly, of course: to their campaigns. The politicians then listen to the people who paid them, and pass the laws those people want. It is not a bribe, because a bribe would be illegal. It is a &amp;ldquo;Super PAC&amp;rdquo;. And if a politician was really helpful, he can leave politics and get a comfortable consulting job with the very people who lobbied him.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He ends with the sentence every European hears:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You just don&amp;rsquo;t get it cause you aren&amp;rsquo;t American, lobbying is definitely not bribery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He is right, except for one detail: as a European, I understand the concept, but I do not use the word &amp;ldquo;lobbying&amp;rdquo; to describe it.&lt;br&gt;
I use another word: &lt;strong&gt;corruption&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I opened the &lt;a href=&#34;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption&#34;&gt;Wikipedia page&lt;/a&gt;, and the first paragraph made me smile.&lt;br&gt;
Corruption is defined as the abuse of entrusted power for private gain, and it explicitly includes bribery, influence peddling, embezzlement, and fraud, &amp;ldquo;as well as practices that are legal in many countries, such as &lt;strong&gt;lobbying&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is the trick, written in a neutral encyclopedia voice: the practice is the same, only its legality changes.
The page even has a section called &amp;ldquo;legal corruption&amp;rdquo;, where power is abused &lt;strong&gt;within the confines of the law&lt;/strong&gt;, precisely because those with power can write the laws that protect them. Depressing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So we don&amp;rsquo;t really disagree George, we just name the &lt;strong&gt;same animal&lt;/strong&gt; differently.&lt;br&gt;
It seems the trend in the US is &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/29/trump-ai-deal-tech-ceos-superintelligence&#34;&gt;to rebrand absolutely everything&lt;/a&gt;, including &amp;ldquo;corruption&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, in conclusion and as a European, I understand that lobbying &lt;strong&gt;is&lt;/strong&gt; corruption. The main difference is that lobbying comes from a guy in a nicer suit, with a lawyer supervising.&lt;br&gt;
Simple, basique.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
